Where Are The Parents?

A listener writes, regarding the Judge who overturned Prop 8: He saw a law that infringed on the rights of a minority group and ruled it unconstitutional. The majority can not take away the rights of a minority just because they don't like who or what they are.

Is that what happened? A majority of the voting population of a State simply saw something they didn't like and decided to outlaw it? No objective moral or social reasoning, just emotional reaction?

Constitutions exist to protect societies from being hijacked by virtually any person or group which decides to take it in another direction. The Framers of our Constitution did not see homosexuality as a good thing, nor even as a benign "alternative" life style.

Couched, as it is in biblical principle and philosophy, our Constitution protects us from morally destructive ideals and practices. It does not view selfish desire as an alternative to good order.

Homosexuality is not new. It's been around for millennia. It has never been identified with a morally superior culture. The cultures which embraced it eroded from within and vanished. Homosexuality has never been equated with 'good order.'

There is, as yet, no link of homosexual desire with DNA or with brain chemistry. Try as supporters might, they are left with the reality that homosexuality is a self-serving desire. A sexual desire that leaves those who practice it less stable, emotionally, less healthy, physically and less able to strengthen the society in which it exists.

When a small percentage of the population (3/5%) seek to drag the majority into moral and physical degradation, how is it that the majority has no right to protect itself? It seems to me that this is exactly what the majority should be doing.

The States that support homosexual unions have done so against the will of the majority, through legislative fiat. So, how is it that the minority has the right to take away the rights of the majority, simply because they don't like something?

Homosexuality kills! It is physically destructive, resulting in billions of dollars a year in health care costs -- to the majority.

Homosexuality destroys! It is morally and socially destructive to a society. It costs the society in terms of stability, attacking as it does, the family structure.

Homosexuality corrupts! Seen as normal, it is more likely to attract young people into the behavior, experimentally at first, but then like an addictive drug to the complete corruption of their moral fiber.

Homosexuality destroys 'good order.' A judge recently overturned the military's 'don't ask - don't tell' policy, paving the way to open homosexuality in the military. This, despite the opinion of Service Chiefs, all of which claim it will destroy good order and military effectiveness.

That otherwise intelligent human beings can't see the danger and destructiveness of this behavior, points to a moral degradation of our society. We are being conditioned to accept every human desire and behavior as 'normal.'

Do you think this will strengthen our culture? And, if it's not morally strong, do you think it can withstand a concentrated attack from a determined enemy?

Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, killing over 2000 mostly military personnel.
Islamic radicals attacked New York City, killing over 3000 civilians.

We conquered Japan in just over 4 years. With radical Islam, it's been 9 years and we're the bigots if we don't want them to erect a shrine to their treachery, a scant 300 yards from their greatest victory.

Other than fulfilling the sexual desire of those practicing it, homosexuality has no redeeming qualities. Let the 'parents' of this society stand up and tell the 'children' NO!

Useful Idiots

I was interviewed by a conservative talk show host, recently, who trotted out all the old liberal chestnuts about homosexual rights.

They are a much-maligned segment of society.
The government has no business in our bedrooms.
We can't legislate morality.
They have rights, too.

It was sickening! They are a much-maligned segment of society for good reason! They are seeking to destroy this society. Not the average person who engages in homosexual behavior but the Gay Rights Activists. You can't take your children to a Gay Pride Parade, for example. And, if they get their way, the "family" will forever be dismantled and destroyed. This is no small thing, the family being the Basic Building Block of Society!!!!

The government was NEVER in anyone's bedroom! They brought their bedroom out into the street and into our faces! The laws against homosexuality, in the old days, were about sodomy. Sodomy is a physically, emotionally and socially destructive practice, and every government has the right / responsibility to protect its citizens from harmful people and/or practices.

EVERY law on the books legislates morality! Highway speed laws, animal leash-laws, jay-walking laws, ALL legislate morality. In this world there are some things which are right and therefore good and some things which are wrong and therefore bad. Governments pass laws to support the good and limit the bad. That's legislating morality.

Everyone has the RIGHT to be stupid, but it's not a good idea for the majority to be this way. When a person or a society emphasizes Rights, the tendency is toward Anarchy. When Responsibility is being emphasized it tends toward Character. The "Right" to corrupt our children and co-opt the family is not a good thing. Society's "parents" have a responsibility to control for such things.

You know the inmates are running the asylum when 'conservatives' are convinced that the homosexual arguments are valid! They represent about 3% of the population of this country, they are almost single-handedly responsible for AIDS, and the spread thereof and are openly advocating for the right to have sex with children. They call it 'therapy,' in the psychological publications and articles where the idea is floated. I first saw it in Psychology Today, about 10 years ago. Ever hear of N.A.M.B.L.A.?

One day people like me will be put in jail for writing a blog like this. And you will be right next to me for simply reading I Cor. 6:9 out loud, in the presence of other people!

Such is the power of sin that good becomes evil and evil becomes good. And it will happen through the efforts of 'useful idiots' who see themselves being compassionate and tolerant where this vile behavior is concerned.

She-Males & Social Policy

One of President Obama's recess-appointees, Chai Feldblum, was key counsel on the drafting and negotiations over ENDA: The Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009.

This is legislation that would require all Federal, State and Local agencies, as well as businesses with more that 15 employees, to stop discriminating against those who are either confused about their gender or simply choose to dress like, or undergo surgery to become like, their opposite gender.

Sponsored by Rep. Barney Frank, with 199 co-sponsors, June 24, 2009, The House Education & Labor Committee hopes to vote on this Bill as early as tomorrow [April 21, 2010]. It prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. According to the Library of Congress summary, it does not apply to religious organizations.

Currently, 38 States have no legislation protecting gender identity. If passed, this Bill will become law in those States, protecting "gender identity" as a minority. This means all State & Local government agencies, as well as businesses employing more than 15 people, will be subject to the law.

Ms. Feldblum is a lesbian activist who advocates for the destruction of the traditional family. She states, "I, for one, am not sure whether marriage is a normatively good institution." [Feldblum, “Rectifying The Tilt"] She is on record as advocating for "polyamorous" relationships. (modern commune?) She wants the government to promote every type of relationship as equal to traditional marriage. Her reasoning is purely subjective: (I believe)

The fact that the American Psychiatric Association currently considers gender identity confusion to be abnormal doesn't seem to factor into this debate. The APA calls it Gender Identity Disorder, meaning it's not normal. But that could change.

Homosexuality used to be considered abnormal, but with upwards of 4% of the population claiming to be homosexual that changed in the 1970's. The APA's new Diagnostic Manual is being released sometime in 2013, so we'll have to wait and see.

The fact that this legislation would allow teachers, undergoing sex changes or just cross-dressing, to continue in the classroom, is appalling to most parents. But for Ms. Feldblum, Rep. Barney Frank and 199 of his peers, this possibility is accepted because people have rights.

Question: Which Government Agency will monitor and enforce this new legislation?
Answer: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Question: To which Government Agency was Ms. Feldblum appointed?
Answer: You already guessed it!

So, when Johnny's teacher shows up with a dark beard, make-up and wearing a dress, while he is taking female hormones in preparation for surgery, don't be surprised if Johnny gets confused.

What Is It About Homosexuality?

Homosexuality has emerged as the Issue of our Age.

Why are so many, so determined to legitimize and mainstream such a highly personal and intimate human behavior? The answer from those who advocate for acceptance of this lifestyle tell us it's about Human Rights. People are being persecuted for their sexual preferences.

Okay. Define "Persecution." Homosexuals have a higher average yearly income than heterosexuals [$55,430, vs. $32,144]. 59.6% of homosexuals are College graduates, compared with 18% of the general public. 49% hold professional / managerial positions, compared to 15.9% of the general population. [Statistical Abstract of the U.S. 1990]

The suicide rate for homosexuals is 50%. 73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person. But 70% of these same psychiatrists say that unhappiness is NOT due to social stigmatization. [Sexual Survey Number 4: Current Thinking on Homosexuality, Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality -- by H. Leif]

Homosexuals live shorter lives [by almost half], are more unhappy, are more unfulfilled, commit more suicides, and are more unhealthy [78% have STDs, account for more than 50% of all AIDs cases, and are infected with intestinal parasites (39 - 59%)].

In addition, they account for 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States -- And this from 2% of the population!

So, I ask: What's with the effort to protect homosexuality?

We can't disparage it. We can't condemn it. We can't discriminate against it. We can't protect our children from being indoctrinated to accept it [State Educ.]. And, if we think this is simply a social issue, consider the new Hate Crimes Legislation or the Bullying Laws being passed. You can go to jail for saying homosexuality is bad!

Is it bad? YES! Is it dangerous? YES! Is it socially destructive? YES! Do you want your 8 year old child introduced to it? NO! But you can't say this in public?

Does anyone stop to consider what's going on and where all this is leading?