A discussion of current issues in light of the Bible. Broadcast each Sunday night 8-11 pm (EST) http://www.ustream.tv/channel/sunday-night-bible-forum www.thebibleforum.net
Saturday, September 14, 2013
WHY RELIGION IS LOSING INFLUENCE IN AMERICA
A recent Gallup Poll found 77% of Americans believe religion is losing its influence on American life. This compares with 1957, when 69% thought religion was increasing its influence on the culture. The highest point was December, 2001, when 71% of the folks thought this way. This was right after 9-11.
Reality? For all it's philosophical stance, as a predominantly Christian culture, America has largely paid lip-service to The Gospel. The rise in public opinion about what Gallup calls "religion,' has been largely emotional. the high-water mark of 71% is a case in point. Patriotism [survival?] was running high and God was on everyone's lips.
After WWII, the same religious euphoria prevailed. Foxholes tend to clarify the realities of life and death as little else does. Men, coming home from war, saved in many cases while in the military, were zealous about Christ and the rise in Evangelistic zeal, as illustrated by Crusades and Campaigns, reflected that zeal. Additionally, there was a 'Baby Boom.'
By the late 1950's, teenagers were everywhere, with more wealth and leisure time than any society this world had ever seen. Youth Ministries were popping up all over the world. It looked good! It felt good! God was making inroads on every front, or so it seemed.
The late 1960's brought reality home, as social, political and racial unrest erupted in city after city. Stirred by the idealism of college campuses and an unpopular (and frightening) war, fueled by drugs, sensual music, Free Love and radical political rhetoric, America woke up!
The euphoria of the 1950's was apparently not real! The perception of peace and prosperity masked a systemic reality: Religion [Christianity] was not as dominant as we thought.
Why? In large part because of the Peace & Prosperity. To a greater degree, because of the Evangelistic Campaigns, both in churches and in Colosseums. These evangelistic appeals relied too much on emotionalism.
There is an excitement generated by public meetings. Religious meetings tap into a deeper part of our psyche. The atmosphere, the staging, the music, the 'star power' of some preachers as well as simply preaching, as a technique, are all calculated to bring folks to a climax: The Decision!
Herein lies The Rub! Salvation is NOT, strictly speaking, a Decision! That Americans have assumed as much may be why so many think themselves to be Christians, while their lives speak a very different language.
We see it in the divorce rates among Evangelical Christians, the drug rates, the abortion rates, the fashions, the worldliness and greed. We see it in the theatrics, the music, the carelessness of what is now being called worship. We see it in the gullibility, foolishness and strange behaviors of church-goers, not to mention the preachers. It is not uncommon to hear about a popular preacher involved in some form of immorality: sex, drugs, alcohol, thievery, etc.
It may be Gallup has it right when they speak of Religion, because biblical Christianity is not like any other religion. Christianity has always been about a heart change. In this sense, it has always been a minority influence.
Well, The Pope Just Threw Jesus Under The Bus!
In an Open Letter to the founder of La Repubblica, Pope Francis stated that non-believers would be forgiven by God if they followed their consciences.
La Repubblica is a radical / socialist newspaper that has moderated to a center-left political stance, in recent years, and was the largest circulation newspaper in Italy in 2011
This is astounding! Why then did Jesus die? What was that all about? What, then, is the pope's role in the world? Why have a Roman Catholic Church? Or any Churches?
The questions are legion. They range from core doctrinal issues to philosophical issues. Not the least of which is: "What Is My Conscience?"
Is my conscience a reliable spiritual guide? Does it operate independently of my mind or my spirit? Is it an independent quality or is it influenced by my heart? Can my conscience be corrupted? Should I let it lead? Is Romans, chapter one, wrong?
What about faith? Will my conscience guide me to Jesus? Is my conscience being protected from all the influences my mind and body experience? Why does the Roman Catholic Church put so much emphases on being holy? What, then, is sin? What is Catholic Confession all about? Why does the Catholic Church insist it's devotees accept [by faith?] the existence of saints? or what these saints presumably can / are doing for 'The Faithful?'
The questions just keep coming! Then there's what the last pope said! His comments on this subject were just the opposite from this one. What are we to make of that?
One Catholic man, asked this question, said the Pope was not speaking 'ex cathedra' -- that is with the authority of the church or of God, merely speaking 'off hand.' So, as a pastor, I can have one doctrine in the pulpit and another on the street, off hand? Or is it that what I say, after studying the issue and preparing the statement can be different from what I really believe?
The New Testament is filled with references to my conscience, not all of them good. What am I to make of this?
The questions just keep coming!
The Yom Kippur Crises In Jerusalem
In some circles there is great concern that Israel is NOT observing God's calendar, in observing the High Holy Days. Reference is being made to Psalm 81 where God declares He gave Israel up to their own hearts' lust because they walked in their own counsels and did not hearken unto Him.
Here's how it goes: God declared, in Leviticus, that The Day of Atonement [Yom Kippur] would be celebrated on the first day of the seventh month. The Hebrew Calendar, starting with Passover, counts the 7th month as beginning with the New Moon of our September. If this is followed, Yom Kippur is Tuesday [Sep't 17]! Not yesterday [Friday, Sep't 14].
Big Deal? To some it is. The Day of Atonement is a Big Deal to observing Jews. They do not have a Temple, nor do they have an altar or Holy of Holies in which to actually celebrate God's atonement. All this was removed with the crucifixion of Christ, Who did away with atonement [the covering of sin], by fulfilling God's Plan of Redemption on The Cross.
However, religious Jews still observe the atonement as a religious rite, waving live chickens over peoples' heads -- a practice being condemned by animal rights groups. The Point is not atonement, per se, but whether or not Israel is following God's Word or simply operating according to human invention.
According to Jonathan David, Israeltoday.co.il, "After Israel's captivity, the Jews stopped waiting and watching for the Lord to reveal the exact date of these holy days, by means of the New Moon. Since the 4th century, Jewish leaders have held that Rosh Hashanah / Feast of Trumpets should never fall on a Sunday, a Wednesday or a Friday. Why? Because God's Covenant People were driven out of the land of Israel and scattered throughout the earth, making it hard to know whose observation of the New Moon and which location on earth should have been used to determine the date."
Will Israel ever get it right? Yes! When Jesus returns! We are told, in the scriptures, that during the Righteous Rule of Jesus, we will celebrate The Feast of Tabernacles in The Kingdom [Zech. 14]. There is no doubt that it will be celebrated on the correct day!
It's A Mystery!
It's a mystery to me why so many people reject The Gospel! Are they brain-dead? The Bible says only a fool believes there is no God [Ps. 53]. This type of fool [there are at least 4 different types in the Bible] is stupid! wicked! impious! Maybe this is the answer, since rejecting The Gospel brings the specter of an unpleasant eternal hell.
I ponder these things and then remember what the scriptures say: "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way." [II Thess. 2:7] This adds a spiritual dynamic beyond intellect, alone.
Human beings are characterized in The Bible as sinners, from birth: born in iniquity. We are 'cut off' from God, unable and unwilling to repent and believe on The Lord Jesus Christ. But here's an additional limitation: The Enemy of our soul is at work hindering men and women from believing!
The old English "let" is confusing. It's referencing the restraining work of the Holy Spirit that keep Satan's efforts from succeeding completely. This restraining ministry will continue until the Spirit of God is 'taken out of the way.' Of course, then, Satan will have almost carte blanche to work his wiles and deceive the masses, even more.
Dispensationalism sees The Church personifying this restraining power, until she is taken from the earth, in The Rapture. This easy solution does not answer some other important questions, however. Satan's liberty to deceive and enslave does not become a reality until the middle of the Great Tribulation, which has given rise to the Mid-Tribulation Rapture Theory. Rapture issues are not the purview of this treatise.
The Point is: The Church represents at least A restraining influence in this world, perhaps THE restraining influence. The reality that sin and wickedness is once again on the increase makes us wonder about how close we are to Christ's Return. In the past couple of centuries we have had The United States as the bastion of Christian Testimony. We have looked to the U.S. for hope and for a hedge against the evils of this world. No More!
Now, the U.S. is at the forefront of wickedness. We just celebrated(?) forty years of Roe v. Wade. Did you know in Liberal, Humanist, Progressive, Socialist France, it is a crime to abort a child after the first Tri-mester? In Russia, their Parliament, the Duma, has recently backed a draft law that outlaws homosexual propaganda.
At home? We're doing all we can to open the flood gates of wickedness and immorality, in every area of society. Social policy, economic policy and government policy. We WANT to get God out of our life and out of our thinking. Keep in mind, God is still restraining wickedness. Can you imagine what the future will look like, if Jesus tarries? It apparently will be worse, if He doesn't!
The Church, The Bride of Christ, is at her weakest point in recent memory. In the past we dealt with men and women who sought to depart from the cardinal doctrines of The Faith, creating new and different doctrines. We called this Liberalism. Today, we are watching folks who think themselves to be Christians flocking to large, impersonal, venues to be titillated and entertained and calling it worship of God.
This is not the worst, however. The newest [and oldest] fad is mysticism. Christians are embracing a mystical form of Christianity where how The Word of God makes them feel or how various techniques can get them out of their bodies, so as to merge with The Spirit, or how these techniques can improve upon what we know of God or of His Word, passes for worship and/or study and/or meditation.
Christian Yoga, Lectio divina, Emerging Church Movement, where feelings matter more than reason; a growing number of young pastors fixated on teaching about sex, in graphic terms, others playing with alternate spiritualities and doctrines. These are what we read about, not Evangelistic efforts or about strong families or dedicated Christians.
There are more "mysteries" afoot than we know. The mystery of iniquity is just one. Mystery Babylon is another. We'll talk about that on Sunday Evening, from 8 - 11 pm. Join Us!
PS: You can watch the Bible Forum from our Facebook Page
[www.facebook.com/BibleForum]
Friday, August 30, 2013
RACISM IN AMERICA?
25,000
people gathered around and in front of the Lincoln Memorial in
Washington, D.C., to remember Dr. King's "I Have A Dream"
speech. This speech, delivered in 1963, is a stirring, dynamic speech
clarifying all that he was trying to achieve.
Many in the Civil Rights Movement were present, along with invited
guests, to 'Remember' and to 'Remind.' It's hard to remember how this
segment of our society was treated, for no reason than the color of
their skin. It's good to be reminded of what we once were, lest we
forget how easy it is to drift back.
However, many who spoke at this Event were not Marking the passing of
an era. They were stirring up old animosities as though they were
current. Are they current? The Black community does not enjoy Middle
Class status. Is that my fault? The Black community is a protected
group. Is that what America is about?
The cry is Racism! It sounds bad. It is bad. But is it true?
For generations, people have claimed racism where none exists! How do I
know? Because, to denigrate or otherwise discriminate against another
race, there must be another race! And there isn't!
I know. This sounds all too petty! But, stay with me. The problems we
have in America, today, regarding discrimination are not, technically,
racial. To keep maintaining this terminology is to miss The Point! To
miss the point is to avoid The Problem. Avoiding the problem means it
will NEVER go away!
Our current concept of racism is a Darwinian idea. More specifically,
a theory posited by British sociologist, Herbert Spencer, in his book,
entitled: "Social Statistics," 1850.
Spencer coined the phrase, "survival of the fittest" to describe the
outcome of competition between social groups. He argued that through
competition social evolution would automatically produce prosperity and
personal liberty unparalleled in human history.
This doesn't sound bad. What made it bad was Darwin's adaptation of it.
He suggested that persons, groups and races are subject to the same
laws of natural selection as were perceived in plants and animals in
nature.
This means some human beings have a greater ability to achieve than
others, based on where they are in their evolution. Think about that!
Human Beings who are not fully evolved? How does that work? What does
that mean? Is that every Black person on the planet or just those who
aren't able or willing to achieve? It's astounding!
The men and women on the platform in Washington, this past week would
have shouted "NO!" But, every day in State Schools and on TV and the
Internet we are told and told and told that we have evolved,
incrementally, up from primordial slime to sentient creatures [oops]
with opposable thumbs. What's the logical conclusion, when we have an
entire group of people we must care for and protect, lest they be left
behind?
It
takes an evil heart to create this sort of disparity in society,
based simply on the color of a person's skin! The
kind of evil God describes in Jeremiah 17:9 -- 'desperately wicked,'
'deceitful above all things.' This is exactly the way God
describes the human heart.
This is exactly what we saw in Nazi Germany, during WWII. Drawing from these principles and applying them in a most logical way, Nazi Germany went about systematically weeding out undesirable illustrations of humanity under the Banner of Eugenics.
Eugenics was / is the term coined by Social Psychologists to describe the effort to purge weaker DNA from the human genome. They didn't know about all that, except that there were people on this planet who were inferior and they could not be permitted to reproduce, if we were to reach the pinnacle of humanity, the stylized 'Aryan Race.'
Blacks, Jews, Homosexuals, Gypsies, the Insane, the weak, Educated men and women who did not support the Nazi goals, and preachers were systematically eliminated. Some were summarily shot, others systematically gassed, while others were useful slaves in work camps, until they died of starvation, depravation and hard work.
After the war, Eugenics fell into disrepute. Not before it was applied to the Black community in notable experimentation. In recent years, in N.C., reparations were paid out to survivors and their families of these so-called efforts to cleanse the gene pool.
Today, it is the Liberal Elite in Academia, Psychology, Sociology and Politics who keep the idea of Eugenics alive. If Darwinian Evolution is true, Eugenics makes great sense!
The Black community would do well to keep a weather eye on their 'Friends.' And, since "Success is the Best Revenge," it would do well for them if they found a way to reclaim the integrity and strength of the Family and focus on becoming a more productive segment of society, before their 'Friends' find a way to use them.....again! And, not simply as stepping stones to their own wealth and power.
Friday, August 23, 2013
The "Gay" Movement Is Actually A Struggle For Survival
Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia [largest 'Twin Register' in the world], the U.S. and Scandinavia, during the last 20 years, all arrived at the same conclusion: Gays Were Not Born That Way! [www.hollanddavis.com]
"At best genetics is a minor factor," says Dr. Neil Whitehead, PhD. Dr. Whitehead worked for the New Zealand government as a scientific researcher for 24 years, spent four years with the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency and most recently serves as a consultant to Japanese universities about the effects of radiation exposure. His PhD is in biochemistry and statistics.
Findings:
Generally, if an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women. In the U.S., it's less: 7.7% for males and 5.3% for females.
Same-sex attraction is caused by "non-shared factors." Things happen to one twin that don't happen to the other. Or...one twin responds one way and the other, another way, to the same factors.
Dr. Whitehead was struck by how fluid and changeable sexual identity can be, especially in adolescents. About half of the homosexual/bisexual population (in a non-therapeutic environment) moves towards heterosexuality over a lifetime. About 3% of the present heterosexual population once firmly believed themselves to be homosexual or bisexual.
The fluidity among adolescents is more pronounced: of the 16 - 17 year olds who had a romantic attraction to the same sex, all had switched one year later. The number of people who have changed towards exclusive heterosexuality are greater than current numbers of bisexuals and homosexuals, combined. In other words, ex-gays outnumber actual gays.
What this indicates is:
Homosexuality is not an inherent orientation.
Homosexuality is not a preferred orientation, statistically, even among homosexuals.
Homosexuality among young people is more experimental than defining.
The homosexual community is not nearly as large as they would have us believe.
That's The Science! Dr. Whitehead notes: "The academics who work in the field are not happy with the portrayals by the media on the subject, but they prefer to stick with their academic research and not get involved in the activist side."
Ex: One activist group openly declares their intention to break the bankbooks and dry up the streams of money coming to those people and groups which seek to overthrow the various gender-neutral laws beginning to proliferate, by mounting court cases even if they know they can't win. The ACLU has used this tactic for decades until most local governments refuse to stand up against them, even if they are right.
Ten to Fifteen million people is a lot of voices, but it still only represents 3 / 5% of the population! A group that cannot reproduce except through recruitment. Half of these folks move toward heterosexuality over their lifetime. They need us! They need people to give them credibility and support or they will dwindle to a small, insignificant minority -- which they are, now! Except for their Voice!
Linda Harvey, writing for MissionAmerica.com, says:
The first step toward homosexuality is realizing an attraction to people of the same sex.
The second step is being encouraged by every homosexual group 'out there.'
The third step is acting on these feelings.
We're told this is an inborn desire / orientation. The science indicates not. How many people are hooked on alcohol, drugs and even sugar? Are these inborn appetites? Or are they learned? Do we have to develop a 'taste' for them, before they control our lives?
Ex-homosexuals often speak of stopping and asking themselves, "How did I get here?" This is the first step in overcoming any destructive or disordered behavior. In the end, homosexual behavior is a cruel task-master! We are not serving our fellow human beings well by keeping quiet.
Of course, neither are we helping by simply condemning those who practice this destructive behavior! The people are caught in a trap! The behavior is The Problem. But, those who seek to keep people enslaved for their own purposes [like getting elected or making money off their misery] have a reserved seat in a very dark place!
"At best genetics is a minor factor," says Dr. Neil Whitehead, PhD. Dr. Whitehead worked for the New Zealand government as a scientific researcher for 24 years, spent four years with the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency and most recently serves as a consultant to Japanese universities about the effects of radiation exposure. His PhD is in biochemistry and statistics.
Findings:
Generally, if an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women. In the U.S., it's less: 7.7% for males and 5.3% for females.
Same-sex attraction is caused by "non-shared factors." Things happen to one twin that don't happen to the other. Or...one twin responds one way and the other, another way, to the same factors.
Dr. Whitehead was struck by how fluid and changeable sexual identity can be, especially in adolescents. About half of the homosexual/bisexual population (in a non-therapeutic environment) moves towards heterosexuality over a lifetime. About 3% of the present heterosexual population once firmly believed themselves to be homosexual or bisexual.
The fluidity among adolescents is more pronounced: of the 16 - 17 year olds who had a romantic attraction to the same sex, all had switched one year later. The number of people who have changed towards exclusive heterosexuality are greater than current numbers of bisexuals and homosexuals, combined. In other words, ex-gays outnumber actual gays.
What this indicates is:
Homosexuality is not an inherent orientation.
Homosexuality is not a preferred orientation, statistically, even among homosexuals.
Homosexuality among young people is more experimental than defining.
The homosexual community is not nearly as large as they would have us believe.
That's The Science! Dr. Whitehead notes: "The academics who work in the field are not happy with the portrayals by the media on the subject, but they prefer to stick with their academic research and not get involved in the activist side."
Ex: One activist group openly declares their intention to break the bankbooks and dry up the streams of money coming to those people and groups which seek to overthrow the various gender-neutral laws beginning to proliferate, by mounting court cases even if they know they can't win. The ACLU has used this tactic for decades until most local governments refuse to stand up against them, even if they are right.
Ten to Fifteen million people is a lot of voices, but it still only represents 3 / 5% of the population! A group that cannot reproduce except through recruitment. Half of these folks move toward heterosexuality over their lifetime. They need us! They need people to give them credibility and support or they will dwindle to a small, insignificant minority -- which they are, now! Except for their Voice!
Linda Harvey, writing for MissionAmerica.com, says:
The first step toward homosexuality is realizing an attraction to people of the same sex.
The second step is being encouraged by every homosexual group 'out there.'
The third step is acting on these feelings.
We're told this is an inborn desire / orientation. The science indicates not. How many people are hooked on alcohol, drugs and even sugar? Are these inborn appetites? Or are they learned? Do we have to develop a 'taste' for them, before they control our lives?
Ex-homosexuals often speak of stopping and asking themselves, "How did I get here?" This is the first step in overcoming any destructive or disordered behavior. In the end, homosexual behavior is a cruel task-master! We are not serving our fellow human beings well by keeping quiet.
Of course, neither are we helping by simply condemning those who practice this destructive behavior! The people are caught in a trap! The behavior is The Problem. But, those who seek to keep people enslaved for their own purposes [like getting elected or making money off their misery] have a reserved seat in a very dark place!
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
LET TEENAGERS HAVE THEIR ROMANTIC SLEEPOVERS
USA TODAY [International Edition -- Aug 16, 2013] Online, suggests parents "rethink mandatory minimums" in letting your teenagers have romantic sleepovers. They explain: "As youthful cohabitation rises, parents should see it as an opportunity to teach."
Responding, Jim Denison, writing in The Christian Post, looks at how it worked out for Angelina Jolie. He says "when Jolie was 14, her boyfriend was allowed to live with her." "The actress plans to raise her children the same way."
So, how did it "work out?" Jolie says of her first sexual experience, "I got knives out and had a night where we attacked each other." She says she still has scars from that episode and continued cutting herself until she became a mother [adopting 6 children, with Brad Pitt -- whom she still refuses to marry].
Of her marriage to Billy Bob Thornton, Rolling Stone magazine [at the time] proclaimed theirs to be America's most dangerous marriage.
After her divorce she had a lesbian relationship. Her father [actor Jon Voight] once said publicly that she had serious mental problems. "She's my kid. And if she gets help, I pray that she will be able to know and to feel true love in this life."
The Times, They Are Achanging! Traditional Christians are shocked by these ideas. New Evangelical, Contemporary, Charismatic and Emerging Church-goers: not so much. This is not to say all these folks approve of teen romantic sleepovers, but traditional Christian values are changing and these groups are at the front of the line that accepts them.
Relying more on how things 'feel' than what The Bible actually says [if they even know]; interested in how things work, rather than the doctrines upon which life-choices stand or fall, the growing Christian influences are doing little to build godly character, let alone convict hearts and condemn sin.
So called "Thinking Christians," "Loving Christians," have little or no problem with the contemporary lifestyle. Divorce, Cremation, Friendly Sex, Homosexuality, Foul Language, and a host of other sins and/or demeaning attitudes and behaviors are commonplace in the world of Christianity, today. We don't want to be judgmental! "No one is perfect!"
Problem No. 1? Many of these folks aren't saved! Aren't really Christians, at all!
Problem No 2? Culturally-popular Churches aren't focused on God's Word!
Problem No 3? The preachers....aren't! Preaching, that is.
Our society would not be where it is, morally and politically, if The Church had been doing her job! For 200 years, the Holy Spirit restrained evil in this culture, as a relatively small group of churches, preachers, Christians stayed focused on biblical values and spiritual commitments, providing moral and spiritual guidance / conviction. All that changed after WWII. Between 1964 and 1973 America underwent a Cultural Revolution. U.S. Supreme Court decisions removed God and biblical morality from the culture.
The public expression of Christianity ultimately accepted these changes under the guise of 'tolerance' and of not being 'judgmental.' The fact that the culture and so-called Christians now embrace homosexuality as normal is evidence of our failure. The forces of evil 'smell blood in the water' and are emboldened. More and more Christian Religionists are caving to social, political, economic, religious immoralities. The culture is rotting from within.
Of course, this is all within the spectrum of God's Over-Arching Plan and Purpose! Jesus said things would be as bad as they were in Noah's day, before He returns. How bad is that? A lot worse than it is now! Those people [estimated to be in the billions] incurred the wrath / judgment of God and were pre-emptively destroyed by a monumental catastrophe that changed the very face of this planet, along with it's climatic systems.
How long, O Lord? "Not Long, My Child!"
Responding, Jim Denison, writing in The Christian Post, looks at how it worked out for Angelina Jolie. He says "when Jolie was 14, her boyfriend was allowed to live with her." "The actress plans to raise her children the same way."
So, how did it "work out?" Jolie says of her first sexual experience, "I got knives out and had a night where we attacked each other." She says she still has scars from that episode and continued cutting herself until she became a mother [adopting 6 children, with Brad Pitt -- whom she still refuses to marry].
Of her marriage to Billy Bob Thornton, Rolling Stone magazine [at the time] proclaimed theirs to be America's most dangerous marriage.
After her divorce she had a lesbian relationship. Her father [actor Jon Voight] once said publicly that she had serious mental problems. "She's my kid. And if she gets help, I pray that she will be able to know and to feel true love in this life."
The Times, They Are Achanging! Traditional Christians are shocked by these ideas. New Evangelical, Contemporary, Charismatic and Emerging Church-goers: not so much. This is not to say all these folks approve of teen romantic sleepovers, but traditional Christian values are changing and these groups are at the front of the line that accepts them.
Relying more on how things 'feel' than what The Bible actually says [if they even know]; interested in how things work, rather than the doctrines upon which life-choices stand or fall, the growing Christian influences are doing little to build godly character, let alone convict hearts and condemn sin.
So called "Thinking Christians," "Loving Christians," have little or no problem with the contemporary lifestyle. Divorce, Cremation, Friendly Sex, Homosexuality, Foul Language, and a host of other sins and/or demeaning attitudes and behaviors are commonplace in the world of Christianity, today. We don't want to be judgmental! "No one is perfect!"
Problem No. 1? Many of these folks aren't saved! Aren't really Christians, at all!
Problem No 2? Culturally-popular Churches aren't focused on God's Word!
Problem No 3? The preachers....aren't! Preaching, that is.
Our society would not be where it is, morally and politically, if The Church had been doing her job! For 200 years, the Holy Spirit restrained evil in this culture, as a relatively small group of churches, preachers, Christians stayed focused on biblical values and spiritual commitments, providing moral and spiritual guidance / conviction. All that changed after WWII. Between 1964 and 1973 America underwent a Cultural Revolution. U.S. Supreme Court decisions removed God and biblical morality from the culture.
The public expression of Christianity ultimately accepted these changes under the guise of 'tolerance' and of not being 'judgmental.' The fact that the culture and so-called Christians now embrace homosexuality as normal is evidence of our failure. The forces of evil 'smell blood in the water' and are emboldened. More and more Christian Religionists are caving to social, political, economic, religious immoralities. The culture is rotting from within.
Of course, this is all within the spectrum of God's Over-Arching Plan and Purpose! Jesus said things would be as bad as they were in Noah's day, before He returns. How bad is that? A lot worse than it is now! Those people [estimated to be in the billions] incurred the wrath / judgment of God and were pre-emptively destroyed by a monumental catastrophe that changed the very face of this planet, along with it's climatic systems.
How long, O Lord? "Not Long, My Child!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)